Guns and Domestic Abusers Don’t Mix
In March the New York legislature took a big step to advance protections for women threatened with domestic abuse. With
the passage of Senate bill S8121, the state will have a new law that
removes all styles of guns from the hands of convicted domestic abusers. It
also adds to the list of “serious” misdemeanor offenses that would
mandate removal, such as menacing and “obstruction of breathing.” Also,
in cases involving orders of protection, it allows a judge to order
abusers to surrender weapons and to suspend their firearms licenses for
the expanded offenses. One dissenter in the 41-19 Senate vote was our local senator, John Bonacic, District 42. A
written statement explaining the senator’s vote isn’t available, but
his office said the law as written might prejudice convicted abusers for
physically non-violent cases, specifically, “coercion,” and it should
have been refined in public hearings and debate before passage. Can you imagine such a debate in our current legislature, dominated by the “three men in a room” style of government?
Unfortunately,
it appears that Senator Bonacic is more committed to the principles of
gun rights for donors than to real safeguards against the murder of
women, over half of whom are killed by intimate partners, overwhelmingly
with firearms. What is the priority: to
protect the “right” of an abuser to his guns or to stand up for the
lives of women, and often their children, who face the fury of a man who
holds in his hands the ultimate instrument of his power and control? Nothing more coercive than that.
Publishing History
Times-Herald Record 4/28